Examining the Compatibility of Student Pair Programmers
Jan 1, 2006·,,,·
0 min read
Laurie Williams
Lucas Layman
Jason Osborne
Neha Katira
Abstract
Pair programming has been shown to be beneficial for both students and teaching staff in university courses. A two-phased study of 1350 students was conducted at North Carolina State University from 2002-2005 to determine if teaching staff can proactively form compatible pairs based upon any of the following factors: personality type, learning style, skill level, programming self esteem, work ethic, or time management preference. We examined compatibility among freshmen, advanced undergraduate and graduate student pair programmers. We have found that overall 93% of students are compatible with their partners. Students notably preferred to pair with a partner that he or she perceived to be of similar or higher skill level to them, which can be predicted by grouping students with similar grade point average. Additionally, pairs comprised of a sensor and an intuitor learning style seem to be compatible, and pairs with differing work ethic are generally not compatible
Type
Publication
AGILE 2006 (AGILE'06)
Collaboration
Collaborative Work
Computer Science
Education
Ethics
Information Technology
North Carolina State University
Peer to Peer Computing
Programming Profession
Statistics
Testing
Advanced Undergraduate Student Pair Programmers
Computer Science Education
Continuing Education
Educational Courses
Ethical Aspects
Freshmen Student Pair Programmers
Graduate Student Pair Programmers
Human Factors
Intuitor Learning Style
Mypubs
Personality Type
Programming
Programming Self Esteem
Skill Level
Teaching
Teaching Staff
Time Management Preference
University Courses
Work Ethic